Debunking K-pop Vocal Myths #9: Having a great voice does NOT mean you’re a great vocalist

Quick Post here guys. This is my new video webseries called “Debunking K-pop Vocal Myths”, where I’ll be posting vocal tips for you guys as often as possible. Please leave a comment, subscribe and share it with others. Let me know if you have any questions and please give suggestions for future videos! I’ll try to make this a Tuesday night weekly thing!


9 thoughts on “Debunking K-pop Vocal Myths #9: Having a great voice does NOT mean you’re a great vocalist

  1. I don’t get why people think you have to be at one extreme end and completely ignore the other? Like I personally prefer timbre/tone/emotions over technique. But does that mean I ignorantly start attacking the concept and bashing technical vocalists by calling them bland and emotionless? Hell naw. Developing good technique is important too! Not only is it crucial for your vocal health, it also helps develop your voice!! Like seriously, if only some people were more mature, the world would be a better place >.<


    1. I really don’t like nitpicking – especially with statements that I don’t entirely disagree with – but technique and timbre aren’t polar opposites that you have to choose between. One is a subjective trait of the voice whereas the other pertains to how it’s used. Everyone is a “technical vocalist” on a spectrum ranging from weak to strong, just as every voice has its own timbre, so you can’t prefer one concept over another altogether because it depends on the individual vocalist and your preference. A person can have a timbre that you find pleasant and be technically proficient at the same time – in fact, healthy technique gives one freedom to use their voice in a variety of ways that showcase its true characteristics and capabilities. While you seem to have a decent idea of the benefits of proper technique, it would benefit you even more to see that the two concepts are intertwined and inseparable. Something to think about.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Agree , look at all those singer in proficient to great. None of them sound the same imo. They all have unique timbre.
        You can be both technically decent & unique


  2. Is Blackpink’s Rose an example of good voice but bad technique? I’m not good at identifying vocal ability, but her placement seems to be in her nose right?


    1. “Good voice” is too subjective. Anybody can have a good voice to you, so anybody can be a good example of “good voice” but not many people can be examples of good technique. Nasality is not unhealthy so even though she’s nasal, that’s not her biggest issue at all.


  3. The part around 5:25 talking about the difference in why a lot of people take singing personally was so good. I was thinking about this recently, not just with vocal/instrumental music, but every other art and the way that people who haven’t developed the skill treat other people working on these skills positively or negatively, from visual art, to theater/acting, voice acting, writing…

    I think among these art forms, the only one where you could kind of get away without having a teacher, or teach yourself is creative writing, and there are a lot of poets and authors in history who never went to school for writing, etc. Probably because we all use spoken/written language on some level idk

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s